| 
      
     | 
      | 
     
      
      
      
        
          | San Antonio Express-News (TX) |  
        
            |  
        
          | Metro and State News Page 01B |  
        
            |  
        
          | New park-and-ride facility could send pollutants 
            into aquifer |  
        
          |   |  
        
          | Carlos 
          Guerra STAFF   |  
        
          |   |  
        
          | Publication Date : November 29, 2007 |  
        
          |   |  
        
          Every week, the San Antonio City Council 
            considers requests for zoning changes and variances, often from 
            developers. And every week, neighbors and others often show up to 
            oppose such changes, arguing that rules should be respected.  But 
            today, the council will consider a truly unusual request. And 
            Elyzabeth Earnley of Aquifer Guardians in Urban Areas will be 
            there to oppose a zoning change for 20 acres of wooded land at the 
            corner of U.S. 281 and Marshall Road.
            "Both the San Antonio Water System and the U.S. Geological 
            Survey say this location is extremely permeable; one of the most 
            porous parts of the Edwards Aquifer," she says.
            But what makes this zoning case so unusual is who is asking 
            for it and for what reason.
            "It's the city of San Antonio that is asking for the change," 
            Earnley explains, so that the VIA Metropolitan Transit can build its 
            sixth -- and largest -- transit park-and-ride facility over one of 
            the most vulnerable areas of the recharge zone.
            Unlike other aquifers, the Edwards does not 
            filter the water that recharges it. Until now, we haven't needed 
            plants to treat our water because nature delivers heavy rainfalls 
            that recharge one of the world's largest karst aquifers, 
            giving us bottled-quality water out of faucets.
            As the recharge zone has been developed, some aquifer 
            protections have been established. Current zoning for these 20 
            acres, for example, limits impervious cover to 15 percent. But if 
            this change is granted, that will rise to 65 percent, which experts 
            say is dangerous.
            "It is well established that once impervious cover exceeds 15 
            percent, contaminant concentrations in surface water increase 
            rapidly," says hydrologist George Rice. "And on the recharge zone, 
            that surface water recharges the aquifer."
            Oil, grease and metals -- including lead and arsenic -- and 
            industrial solvents used for degreasing are often found in parking 
            lots, Rice says. But a study of an Austin creek bounded by parking 
            lots also found "polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in high 
            concentrations in the runoff from parking lots," Rice adds, 
            "especially in the runoff of parking lots sealed with products 
            derived from coal tar."
            And several PAHs, he points out, are suspected carcinogens.
            In a memo to the Zoning Commission, SAWS staff presented 
            powerful arguments for denying the change, noting that USGS found 
            the area to be protected only by very thin layers of soil, that it 
            has "rock outcrop exposures" and probably has caves.
            SAWS staff also expressed "general concerns" about "improper 
            use of pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers needed for landscape 
            maintenance" and "the build-up of hydrocarbons and other pollutants 
            that are then carried off in the first flush of storm water 
run-off."
            Then the SAWS honchos recommended approval of the zoning 
            change -- if proper precautions and storm-water containment plans 
            are developed.
            So what? ask the opponents.
            "We're opposed to this park-and-ride because regardless of 
            what kind of catchments they have, they can't control 100 percent of 
            (the storm water run-off)," says Gregory Snow of the Northwind 
            Property Owners Association, all of whose members rely on their own 
            water wells.
            "We know how it rains and floods in San Antonio, and there 
            will be times when (the runoff) will carry those petrochemicals 
            downhill into the surrounding area and Northwind Estates."
            "This is a continuation of bad city policy," adds Annalisa 
            Peace of the Greater Edwards Aquifer 
            Alliance. "The city allowed high-density development over the 
            recharge zone for years, so now they need a park-and-ride to help 
            with the traffic. But are we going to further pollute the 
            aquifer to make up for the mistakes we already made?
            "We can't treat this as if it's any other piece of land. It's 
            not. It is a very, very sensitive area."
            To contact Carlos Guerra, call (210) 250-3545 
            or e-mail cguerra@express-news.net. His column appears on Tuesdays, 
            Thursdays and Saturdays.
            
             |  
        
          |   |   
 
  | 
      | 
    
      
  
  |